社会保障残疾保险

涉及社会保障残疾保险金申请的行政审查与司法复审

1. Clark v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

2. Jurisdiction: 美国 (2024-08-01)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Social Security Administration, Commissioner]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Clark]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[United States District Court]]><![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]>
4. Case Tags: 社会保障残疾保险;行政法法官;残留功能能力;联邦法院复审

1. McIntire v. Commissioner of Social Security

2. Jurisdiction: 美国 (2024年8月12日)
3. Original Case: McIntire v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
4. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Commissioner of Social Security]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[McIntire]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[Sarah L. Martin]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[John E. Lanza]]>Judges<![CDATA[Michael H. Simon]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]><![CDATA[United States District Court for the District of Oregon]]>
5. Case Tags: 社会保障残疾保险;行政法法官听证;残留功能容量;联邦地区法院复审

1. Grimes v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

2. Jurisdiction: 美国 (2024-09-09)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Martin O'Malley]]><![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Grimes]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]><![CDATA[United States District Court]]>
4. Case Tags: 行政法;社会保障残疾保险;实质性证据标准;程序正义

1. Marshall v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

2. Jurisdiction: United States (September 23, 2024)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Marshall]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit]]><![CDATA[Social Security Administration]]>
4. Status or Result: 第四巡回上诉法院撤销了下级法院判决，并以缺乏实质证据为由，将案件发回社会保障局作进一步审理。
5. Case Tags: 行政法;社会保障残疾保险;残障权利;联邦上诉

1. Minton诉社会保障管理局专员案

2. Jurisdiction: 美国 (2024年9月27日)
3. Original Case: Minton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
4. DefendantsMartin O'MalleyPlaintiffsMichael A. MintonDefense AttorneysRichard Harrison WintersJoseph Paul Palermo IIIRobert Dalton WindhamPlaintiff AttorneysJason P. BaileyJudgesMadeline Hughes HaikalaInstitutionsUnited States District Court for the Northern District of AlabamaSocial Security AdministrationU.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
5. Case Tags: 社会保障残疾保险;行政法;证据审查;残疾认定