Judicial Precedent

A Supreme Court ruling that clarifies the legal boundaries of bid rigging and official involvement.

Case Concerning Violation of the Act on Elimination and Prevention of Involvement in Bid Rigging, etc. and Punishment of Acts by Employees Harming Fairness of Bidding, etc., and Interference with Public Contract Competitive Bidding
  1. Case Concerning Violation of the Act on Elimination and Prevention of Involvement in Bid Rigging, etc. and Punishment of Acts by Employees Harming Fairness of Bidding, etc., and Interference with Public Contract Competitive Bidding
  2. Jurisdiction: Japan (2025)
  3. Original Case: 令和7(わ)63等 入札談合等関与行為の排除及び防止並びに職員による入札等の公正を害すべき行為の処罰に関する法律違反、公契約関係競売入札妨害被告事件
  4. DefendantsDefendant ADefendant BInstitutionsSupreme Court of Japan
  5. Case Tags: Bid Rigging;Official Misconduct;Public Contract Fraud;Judicial Precedent
Shen Tianfu Forgery Case
  1. Shen Tianfu Forgery Case
  2. Jurisdiction: China (Qing Dynasty) (1667 (Sixth year of the Kangxi reign))
  3. Original Case: 沈天甫伪书案
  4. Key Figures: Shen Tianfu, Lü Zhong, Xia Linqi, Wu Yuanlai (son of Ming loyalist Wu Sheng)
  5. Case Tags: Literary Inquisition;Forgery;Extortion;Judicial Precedent